The supply of inexpertise is vastly larger than the supply of expertise, [thus] the public is making very poorly informed judgments about this issue [climate change] and others where complex information is at issue and genuine expertise should matter. –Michael Tobis
Are we talking about science of alchemy here?
More disturbing evidence of fraud:
Then there’s this:
It just keeps piling up.
AGW is slowly being shown to be the massive fraud that it is. The environmental movement will soon have to move on to the next false scare.
Link 1: A few decade old emails with no context? Thats it. Lets wait until we have something conclusive before claiming that an entire branch of science is a fraud?
Link 2: Not the CRU data molehill again.
Link 3: No one (except for deniers apparently) is baffled by the temperature of the past decade. The 2000s are on track to be the warmest decade on record (so no real stagnation, also see here), but even if there were a plateau in temperature or even slight cooling it would be consistent with climate models.
More on those emails, Mann sums it up perfectly when he says:
And RealClimate has the details:
No mountains here, just another mole hill.