A reasonably thorough debunking of the ‘more CO2 is good for plants’ talking points Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Related One thought on “A reasonably thorough debunking of the ‘more CO2 is good for plants’ talking points” Add yours Thanks. I’ve been wondering about the co2 fertilizer bit. One thing I can’t fathom is the guy (name escapes me) that promotes the “fertilzer” the strongest was once a good scientist w/ ARS before he retired. Reply Leave a ReplyCancel reply
Thanks. I’ve been wondering about the co2 fertilizer bit. One thing I can’t fathom is the guy (name escapes me) that promotes the “fertilzer” the strongest was once a good scientist w/ ARS before he retired. Reply
Thanks. I’ve been wondering about the co2 fertilizer bit.
One thing I can’t fathom is the guy (name escapes me) that promotes the “fertilzer” the strongest was once a good scientist w/ ARS before he retired.