It's not enough to bash in heads, you have to bash in minds
            

CEI accurately describes the anti-scientific nature of climate change denial

I’d like to thank the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) for publishing such an unintentionally informative and amusing newsletter. Rarely has the anti-scientific nature of global warming denial been so well stated in a mere two sentences:

A scientist who says that the atmosphere is warming, and cites certain physical processes, is still a scientist. A scientist who argues that people must take certain acts to avoid disaster has become a priest.

In other words, “A doctor who diagnoses your diabetes using medical tests is still a doctor. A doctor who tells you to exercise, change your diet, monitor glucose levels, and/or take insulin to avoid acute complications has become a priest.

What’s funny about this is that nonscientist deniers have no trouble whatsoever offering their absurd “scientific conclusions” that the climate isn’t changing, the earth isn’t warming, it’s all sunspots, blah, blah, blah, but then attack scientists for offering serious scientific and technological judgments about the solution to global warming.

(via Climate Progress)

One Response to CEI accurately describes the anti-scientific nature of climate change denial

  1. So if people who provided advice based on their knowledge are priest.

    What are people who provide advice based on their lack of knowledge, destructive idiots!!?

Leave a Reply