Note to George Will: Using a creationist as your scientific authority is a bad idea
George Will is at it again. Thankfully this time he steers mostly away from argument’s requiring facts to back him up, preferring instead to argue that since China wont commit to firm GHG emissions reductions we should do anything. Despite the fact that such arguments only really make sense if your refuse to accept global warming, they don’t require blatant falsifications.
But given the subject matter you know George wouldn’t go an entire column without making a serious factual blunder:
George Will debunked not once, not twice, not even three times, but four times by WaPo articles
George Will’s recent articles on climate change In the Washington Post have been thoroughly debunked, despite this no correction has been issued. We have, however, gotten the next best thing, four Washington Post articles calling out George Will for the blatant falsehoods in his articles.
Al Gore vs George Will
Two recent events have provided us clear view of the difference between those who wish to communicate clearly the science of climate change and those wish to deny it.
