Comments on: Amazon(non)gate http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834 It's turtles all the way down Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:05:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Episode 5: Show notes — Irregular Climate http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-73047 Episode 5: Show notes — Irregular Climate Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:04:52 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-73047 [...] Amazon(non)gate background [...] [...] Amazon(non)gate background [...]

]]> By: Glenn Beck: ‘There aren’t enough knives’ for ‘dishonored’ climate scientists to kill themselves. | No Bull. news service. http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71973 Glenn Beck: ‘There aren’t enough knives’ for ‘dishonored’ climate scientists to kill themselves. | No Bull. news service. Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:00:21 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71973 [...] a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the first to tell climate [...] [...] a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the first to tell climate [...]

]]> By: Wonk Room » The WonkLine: February 3, 2010 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71895 Wonk Room » The WonkLine: February 3, 2010 Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:45:47 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71895 [...] journalists are fanning the flames of attacks on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change with misleading claims and outright false assertions, lapped up by the denialist [...] [...] journalists are fanning the flames of attacks on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change with misleading claims and outright false assertions, lapped up by the denialist [...]

]]> By: Gate N « Gravity Loss http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71866 Gate N « Gravity Loss Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:21:04 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71866 [...] a sloppy reference to Amazon droughts in IPCC AR4 WG2 that turns out to be correct in the end. Scruffy Dan: Sounds, like the same type of issue as the Himalayan glacier error, citing the grey-literature, [...] [...] a sloppy reference to Amazon droughts in IPCC AR4 WG2 that turns out to be correct in the end. Scruffy Dan: Sounds, like the same type of issue as the Himalayan glacier error, citing the grey-literature, [...]

]]> By: Susann http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71865 Susann Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:50:13 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71865 I have a blog discussing the global warming debates / wars over at http://shewonk.wordpress.com and someone posted a link to your blog. I have a blog discussing the global warming debates / wars over at http://shewonk.wordpress.com and someone posted a link to your blog.

]]> By: ScruffyDan http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71864 ScruffyDan Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:30:30 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71864 @ Susann Thanks. Yep it was just a lazy reference, yet despite what has been claimed the reference does support the text in the IPCC (see the post update). It still would have been better to cite the primary literature directly, but not really a big deal. BTW not sure what page you are referring to. @ Susann

Thanks. Yep it was just a lazy reference, yet despite what has been claimed the reference does support the text in the IPCC (see the post update).

It still would have been better to cite the primary literature directly, but not really a big deal.

BTW not sure what page you are referring to.

]]> By: Susann http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71863 Susann Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:09:29 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71863 Sorry -- someone posted a link to your website, not you. Sorry — someone posted a link to your website, not you.

]]> By: Susann http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71862 Susann Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:05:18 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2834#comment-71862 Good post. Thanks for posting a link on my page. I'm glad to have that clarified. It was, in my estimation, lazy referencing rather than a mistake. Good post. Thanks for posting a link on my page. I’m glad to have that clarified. It was, in my estimation, lazy referencing rather than a mistake.

]]>