Comments on: The Himalayas circa 2035 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815 It's turtles all the way down Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:05:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Drasties - Dutch on the World - World on the Dutch http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71976 Drasties - Dutch on the World - World on the Dutch Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:04:51 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71976 [...] effort paints a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the [...] [...] effort paints a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the [...]

]]> By: Glenn Beck: ‘There aren’t enough knives’ for ‘dishonored’ climate scientists to kill themselves. | No Bull. news service. http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71972 Glenn Beck: ‘There aren’t enough knives’ for ‘dishonored’ climate scientists to kill themselves. | No Bull. news service. Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:58:07 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71972 [...] effort paints a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the [...] [...] effort paints a wild picture of a global conspiracy to defraud the public, based on a handful of inaccurate or poorly sourced but valid claims buried in the 3,000-page report. Unfortunately, Beck is not the [...]

]]> By: ScruffyDan http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71874 ScruffyDan Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:32:12 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71874 For me refuted means shown to be false . Which I define separately from convincing non-experts. Politics can bury truth, and can even convince people of falsehoods, but it cannot refute truth. If only more people would understand this distinction. For me refuted means shown to be false . Which I define separately from convincing non-experts.

Politics can bury truth, and can even convince people of falsehoods, but it cannot refute truth. If only more people would understand this distinction.

]]> By: nanibold http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71870 nanibold Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:49:18 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71870 "This most recent attack on the IPCC is purely political, and science can not be refuted by politics." Define 'refuted'. I fear that the truth can easily be buried by the politics, convincing some unreasonably large percentage of the population that the science really *has* been refuted, in which case it almost kind of has been. Even though it hasn't. You know what I mean. “This most recent attack on the IPCC is purely political, and science can not be refuted by politics.”

Define ‘refuted’. I fear that the truth can easily be buried by the politics, convincing some unreasonably large percentage of the population that the science really *has* been refuted, in which case it almost kind of has been. Even though it hasn’t. You know what I mean.

]]> By: Glaciers are retreating, but won’t be gone in 2035 « My view on climate change http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71846 Glaciers are retreating, but won’t be gone in 2035 « My view on climate change Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:47:00 +0000 http://mind.ofdan.ca/?p=2815#comment-71846 [...] More good posts at MoD, Deltoid Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The Vanishing Mingyong Glacier – Blame [...] [...] More good posts at MoD, Deltoid Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The Vanishing Mingyong Glacier – Blame [...]

]]>